Octavia E. Butler, Kindred
Apr. 9th, 2009 04:54 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
People who know me know that I like sci fi. Octavia Butler is pretty much the classic PoC sci fi author. Aside from this, all I knew about her was that she writes vampire books and she wrote Kindred. I did not read anything about Kindred before I requested it from the library. I kept waiting for the vampires to show up, and only realized 35 pages in that it was not, in fact, a vampire book. D'oh!
Kindred is instead the story of Dana, a black woman married to a white man in 1976, who keeps traveling back to the nineteenth century at moments that allow her to save the life of her white, slave-owning ancestor Rufus.
I read the first thirty-some pages on Monday, another forty-some pages on Tuesday, and the rest of the book in one sitting yesterday, a sitting where I kept thinking, "At the next section break, I'll get up and do my weight lifting," but didn't. That's a pretty good sign that it's an engrossing, compelling story.
I have this idea in my head that Octavia Butler is a Serious Writer who deals with Serious Issues, which she does. The book clearly tackles both the issue of white slave owners fathering children with their black slaves via rape and the issue of how easily people adapt to their circumstances, even if those circumstances mean they become slaves. The Serious Issue that seemed hinted at but not directly addressed is how their time in the past changes Dana and Kevin's relationship in the present of 1976.
Some of the dialogue is a little stilted, and not the nineteenth-century dialogue, either, but the 1976 dialogue. I suspect most of that is simply the formula of writing in the 70s (I can't remember the last time I read a non-children's book written before 1990, so I don't really have anything to compare it to), but there's at least one spot where the message is showing a little too clearly.
In terms of broadening my experience of the world, I have to admit that I had a hard time really accepting how easily Dana adapted to being a slave. I'm not sure how much of this is the writing not pulling me far enough into her head and how much of it is my white privilege that means I've never had to think about what it would be like to be a slave, which is clearly something Dana lives with even before her time travel experiences. I was skimming Racialicious earlier today, and in recounting a discussion about BDSM race play, Andrea Plaid says, "Personally, I think of race play and, yeah, I feel the body memories of slavery, too," which makes me more convinced it's my white privilege showing.
Kindred is instead the story of Dana, a black woman married to a white man in 1976, who keeps traveling back to the nineteenth century at moments that allow her to save the life of her white, slave-owning ancestor Rufus.
I read the first thirty-some pages on Monday, another forty-some pages on Tuesday, and the rest of the book in one sitting yesterday, a sitting where I kept thinking, "At the next section break, I'll get up and do my weight lifting," but didn't. That's a pretty good sign that it's an engrossing, compelling story.
I have this idea in my head that Octavia Butler is a Serious Writer who deals with Serious Issues, which she does. The book clearly tackles both the issue of white slave owners fathering children with their black slaves via rape and the issue of how easily people adapt to their circumstances, even if those circumstances mean they become slaves. The Serious Issue that seemed hinted at but not directly addressed is how their time in the past changes Dana and Kevin's relationship in the present of 1976.
Some of the dialogue is a little stilted, and not the nineteenth-century dialogue, either, but the 1976 dialogue. I suspect most of that is simply the formula of writing in the 70s (I can't remember the last time I read a non-children's book written before 1990, so I don't really have anything to compare it to), but there's at least one spot where the message is showing a little too clearly.
In terms of broadening my experience of the world, I have to admit that I had a hard time really accepting how easily Dana adapted to being a slave. I'm not sure how much of this is the writing not pulling me far enough into her head and how much of it is my white privilege that means I've never had to think about what it would be like to be a slave, which is clearly something Dana lives with even before her time travel experiences. I was skimming Racialicious earlier today, and in recounting a discussion about BDSM race play, Andrea Plaid says, "Personally, I think of race play and, yeah, I feel the body memories of slavery, too," which makes me more convinced it's my white privilege showing.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-10 12:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-10 12:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-10 12:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-10 12:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-10 03:25 pm (UTC)I used to say I never read vampire or werewolf books, but then Patricia Briggs started writing them, and I read more of them now, although just being a vampire book isn't enough of an enticement for me - there has to be something else going on too. I will check out L.A. Banks and Tanarive Due, though.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-10 04:38 pm (UTC)She kind of does, though I wouldn't say they are the type of book where the reader ends up rolling their eyes and going "GOD, Octavia, use Western Union already". (Except, possibly, Parable of the Talents.)
no subject
Date: 2009-04-10 07:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-10 07:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-10 08:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-10 10:13 pm (UTC)The whole thing gave me mental hives in a weird way that I am not sure I can explain without spoiling the book!
no subject
Date: 2009-04-12 03:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-12 03:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-12 03:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-10 05:46 pm (UTC)And then there was no next book.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-10 07:39 pm (UTC):(
I hadn't made it to Fledgling in my to-read stack by the time she died, and after that I saved it up for quite a while because I didn't want to have finished everything.... dammit.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-10 08:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-10 08:30 pm (UTC)My favorite author ever, whom I have been reading for the past twenty-five years and pretty much grew up with, has become elderly and doesn't publish much anymore. One of his more recent books sat unread on my shelf for an age and a day, because I couldn't stand the possibility of maybe not having any more of his to read.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-12 02:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-10 01:47 am (UTC)(Especially since my first knowledge of Butler was that her book was awesome but also so brutal and violent and soul-ripping that I'd look at one of her books and ask myself, "Are you feeling brave today?" And most days, the answer was "No.")
Thanks for the reminder that the bookclub is coming up -- I need to pluck Kindred down off the shelf and give it a re-read this weekend or next.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-10 03:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-10 03:27 pm (UTC)See, that's been my impression of Butler, too, which is why I've never read anything by her before, despite having actually owned one of her books once.
Oh, huh. I had no idea it was the bookclub book. I'm looking forward to the discussion post!
no subject
Date: 2009-04-10 02:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-10 07:44 am (UTC)I have the DVD box set. This is a subject of some shame for me...
no subject
Date: 2009-04-10 02:10 pm (UTC)Thanks to papertigers for some vampire fic recs. I need to get the taste of LK Hamilton out of my mouth.
...I wish I hadn't typed that.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-10 02:13 pm (UTC)Sometimes people feel icky after reading her books too.
I'm sorry. I saw an opportunity for cheap smut. I couldn't help myself. I'm a bad bad woman.
somewhat OT:
Date: 2009-04-10 08:30 pm (UTC)*snerk*
< tangent >oh, you want vampire stories? (http://www.vampirelibrary.com/) < /tangent >
Re: somewhat OT:
Date: 2009-04-10 08:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-10 03:28 pm (UTC)