![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)

I need to have my own copy of this book. And I will possibly buy two copies and donate one to the library where I work, because they need to have a copy too.
This book is brilliant. I haven't seen the movie (although I've been reliably informed that I really must see it), and I have to admit that now I'm not entirely certain how the book would transfer to the screen (although clearly it must have done). The magical-realism elements (I'm not sure what else to call the sections of the book from the whales' point of view) took a while to get into, and yet once I did, were magnificent. The whole book showed up, in a way, the paucity of the way that Australians relate to our indigenous peoples, when this book can be written, become a best seller, and then an international success as a movie, while books of Australian "folklore" are full of stories about bushrangers. (More)
no subject
Date: 2009-02-26 07:53 pm (UTC)The "our" was intended as a distinction between Australia and New Zealand, and also an owning of the situation (this is "our" problem). But yes, I could have used sharper language.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-03 05:22 am (UTC)But I also appreciated sanguinity's point about your word choice, and your response to that point.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-03 05:25 am (UTC)Of course I think that both countries' powers-that-be should do a lot more, but I feel that Canada fails less in the endeavor than does the US.